A Comparative Study on Welfare Losses of Specific Duties and Ad Valorem Duties in Monopolistic Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/022m2c97Keywords:
Specific taxation; AD valorem tax; Monopoly market; Loss of benefits; Unnecessary loss.Abstract
Based on the establishment of a monopoly market model, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of the welfare effects of specific tax and AD valorem tax policies. The findings show that in a monopoly market, specific taxes and AD valorem taxes have different effects on market equilibrium, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total social welfare. By studying monopolistic markets described by linear demand functions and cost functions, we explore the pricing, output and welfare loss of monopolistic enterprises under two tax systems. The results show that the specific tax, which is a fixed unit tax rate, directly increases marginal costs, thus resulting in a small increase in monopoly prices but a significant decrease in output. AD valorem taxes, which are levied proportionally, indirectly affect pricing, and the extent of their welfare loss depends on the rate of tax and the elasticity of demand. In general, AD valorem taxes cause less unnecessary loss than specific taxes because AD valorem taxes have a certain self-regulating function, which to some extent can mitigate the adverse effects of monopoly pricing on social welfare. But when the elasticity of market demand is low or the degree of monopoly is high, the gap in welfare loss between the two will be smaller. In addition, this paper also analyzes issues such as tax revenue, administrative costs, and the possibility of policy implementation, and argues that AD valorem tax has certain advantages in terms of the stability of tax revenue and the effectiveness of anti-monopoly, but there are also problems in terms of collection costs and regulatory difficulty. Therefore, the findings of this study provide some reference value for the government in formulating tax policies in monopolistic industries. It is recommended to choose appropriate tax methods based on the characteristics of different industries, market conditions and policy goals to achieve the greatest social benefits.
Downloads
References
[1] Schroder, P. J. H. (2004). The comparison between ad valorem and unit taxes under monopolistic competition. Journal of Economics, 83(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-004-0081-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-004-0096-y
[2] Anderson, S. P., de Palma, A., & Kreider, B. (2001). The efficiency of indirect taxes under imperfect competition. Journal of Public Economics, 81(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00119-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00085-2
[3] Hu, T. (2017). Research on the equilibrium and coordination of supply chain networks in oligopolistic markets [Master’s thesis]. Dalian University of Technology.
[4] Wang, Z., & Tang, A. (2015). The impact of ad valorem resource tax on the coal market. Accounting Monthly, (5), 41–46.
[5] Wang, G., & Tang, S. (2009). Analysis of non-cooperative technological innovation based on differentiated oligopolistic competition. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), (1), 65–68.
[6] Wang, K., & Zhong, G. (2009). Game analysis of anti-dumping rates based on monopolistic market structure of upstream and downstream. International Economic and Trade Exploration, (2), 16–19.
[7] He, H., & Chen, L. (2017). Vertically linked markets, resource tax reform and China's rare earth exports: An assessment of the implementation effects of resource specific and ad valorem taxes. Journal of Finance and Economics, 43(7), 95–106.
[8] Tao, A., Zhu, Y., & Zou, X. (2014). Proceedings of the 9th (2014) China Management Conference - Management and Decision Science Session [Conference proceeding]. China Society for Management Modernization, Fudan Management Award Foundation, Institute of Accounting, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting, School of Mathematics and Information Science, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting, School of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting. pp. 161–171.
[9] Xin, H. (2014). Research on the selection of ad valorem tax rates and simulation of macroeconomic impact of resource tax on coal in China. Price Theory and Practice, (10), 18–20.
[10] Xu, R., & Liu, X. (2011). Research on the relationship between ad valorem tax on exhaustible resources and cumulative exploitation: An improvement based on the Hotelling model. Operations Research and Management, 20(5), 73–78.
[11] Ji, Y., & Fu, C. (2005). Batch assessment: A tax base assessment method for ad valorem tax. China Appraisal, (11), 5–9, 3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
